New Theme Coming June 1st!

[Some Guy]

For those who are wanting something a little more organized and a forum that takes up less space and allows you to Enjoy something fresh , Exciting, and Just simple all around, the new BCFCB Theme applies to your taste, Works with Smartphones or any other device you may use.  Simple in Design, Yet elegant Look.


Here is a Preview of the new Theme.

[Kithop]

I likie! n.n;  A vectorish logo, and I'm a sucker for rounded buttons/corners. (Mac user. c.c;)

[Mirka]

OOOOH nice! I like that better than what we have currently (plus, I think that theme would work nice on the iPhone ^^)

[Some Guy]

For those who are wanting something a little more organized and a forum that takes up less space and allows you to Enjoy something fresh , Exciting, and Just simple all around, the new BCFCB Theme applies to your taste, Works with Smartphones or any other device you may use.  Simple in Design, Yet elegant Look.


Here is a Preview of the new Theme.

The new theme set date is June 1st 2009 , please do not panick if the theme changes if your offline, because after seeing the notice you will know that there is a new theme applied for all BCFCB members.

~BCFCB Admin

Ravkamon

[Some Guy]

New theme is here!

[Vanilla Skunk]

Yay for new theme that's compatable with Windows Mobile!

I have yet to test it on Nokia Browser though.

[Silvermink]

Seems to work pretty well on an iPhone.

[Some Guy]

i modded this theme because it was simplistic, and i knew it would go to everyones tastes since it shouldnt take much time to load, Less script. Simpler Design.

im glad your enjoying :)

[Kithop]

Yes - faster/simpler sites > bloated/complex 'fancy' sites by far.  I hate sites that load umpteen billion Flash applets and have Flash 'splash pages' and Flash rollover menus and arrrr... @.x;;;

Faster/simpler means less bandwidth, less processing power, and less time waiting.  I likie so far. :D

[Silvermink]

Yes - faster/simpler sites > bloated/complex 'fancy' sites by far.  I hate sites that load umpteen billion Flash applets and have Flash 'splash pages' and Flash rollover menus and arrrr... @.x;;;

Flash-based UIs make baby Jesus cry.

[Kithop]

Yes - faster/simpler sites > bloated/complex 'fancy' sites by far.  I hate sites that load umpteen billion Flash applets and have Flash 'splash pages' and Flash rollover menus and arrrr... @.x;;;

Flash-based UIs make baby Jesus cry.

I'd go so far as to argue Flash in general, but okay. :P

[Silvermink]

I'd go so far as to argue Flash in general, but okay. :P

I think it's okay for little movies and games, but the lack of browser integration and expected functionality makes it such a complete cluster-you-know-what for web UIs in particular.

[Kithop]

Movies were sorted before Flash came along, though - we have plenty of standard file formats... it should be up to the user's browser/setup to decide what to play it in, be it an inline player or launching an external one like VLC/Mplayer.  Flash was the path of least resistance to get people H.264 codecs, though - people didn't want to get new media players, but would let Flash auto-update itself. :/

I guess the little web-games are alright, though honestly I thought that's what Java was for, originally.  Except Sun screwed that up royally. :x

[Vanilla Skunk]

Flash is also not compatable with some phones these days.

My phone has Flash Player, but doesn't support flash applets in webpages, it's weird.

[Silvermink]

Flash is also not compatable with some phones these days.

My phone has Flash Player, but doesn't support flash applets in webpages, it's weird.

Yeah, the iPhone has a YouTube app that will play its Flash videos, but its version of Safari doesn't support Flash on webpages either.