another baby furs on here

[Renwaldo]

I will say I have no idea why people like Scat.

But then again, I have seen dogs eat fecal matter out of baby diapers.  (True babies by the way.)  I guess I shouldn't judge.

Ugh! Good god Felix, is this really the place to discuss such things?!  :(

[Ember]

Ember! Get in here right now! I have found a use for you!
:o

*Earperks*

[Vanilla Skunk]

Ugh! Good god Felix, is this really the place to discuss such things?!  :(

Yes it is.  I used that as an example because I find it very disgusting myself, just like a good number feel about babyfurs.

[Van_Fox]

I think it would be more acceptable if baby furs were actually under the age of 20.

[Acco]

I think it would be more acceptable if baby furs were actually under the age of 20.

I think it comes down to this: Inflation's a weird fetish. Furries are okay with that. Vore is a weird fetish. Furries are okay with that. Watersports is a weird fetish. Furries are okay with that. Snuff is a very weird fetish. Furries accept it. Castration is a weird fetish. Furries also accept this.

What's the difference between any of the weirdness/squickiness of these fetishes and diapers? Live and let live man.

[Gizmo]

I think it would be more acceptable if baby furs were actually under the age of 20.

so a 14, 15, 16 year old wearing a diaper is acceptable but a 30, 40, or 50 year old, its not? Hmmmm

[Van_Fox]

So furries accept yiffing babies?

[Gizmo]

So furries accept yiffing babies?

Yiffing? I'll have to re-read the thread and see where ANYONE actually mentioned ANYTHING about Yiffing!!! If they did, I am outta here!!!

[Van_Fox]

If baby/diaper furs is a fetish (fetish deriving from a sexual nature), then wouldnt that mean some furries find baby furs sexually attractive? Which in my book is just wrong?

[Gizmo]

If baby/diaper furs is a fetish (fetish deriving from a sexual nature), then wouldnt that mean some furries find baby furs sexually attractive? Which in my book is just wrong?

There's one thing about 'yiffing' an underage child ... its another when there is a perception of an ADULT being a child. Explain again how that is wrong???

[Van_Fox]

Its not that, its the concept.

[Gizmo]

Its not that, its the concept.

The 'concept' of being younger than my chronological age is wrong? We should contact all the skin care companies in the world ... all the make up retailers in the mall ... tell them all that what they sell (the ability to look younger than the customer really is) is WRONG?? Really????

[Acco]

Its not that, its the concept.

Think you might have the concept even a little bit messed up. It's not necessarily true that babyfur = liking to have sex roleplaying an underage person/roleplaying the older person either. Some have it, sure. Perhaps thats maybe a little bit disagreeable to some. But its certainly not the case for a majority of people into it.

You should consider actually getting to know a couple before lumping everybody from this group into being undesirable from an assumption.

[Selkit]

Van, before you jam your foot further into your mouth, assuming a stereotype can generally be applied to an entire group, allow me to explain something here:

Babyfur != pedophile. Much like there are trans-gendered individuals, or individuals with dysmorphia, the Babyfur phenomenon is most commonly, a dysmorphic expression applied to age, rather than some physical characteristic. The vast majority of babyfurs I know are nonsexual, and generally entertaining to be around regardless of what their actual biological age is. Sexuality has little to no involvement in their fandom, and for that matter? A lot of the mainstream furry fandom *doesn't* express their fandom in sexuality. Much like how furry != automatic bestiality practitioner, babyfur != automatic pedophile.

[Vanilla Skunk]

Thank you, Selkit.

That was way better than what I had to say.