BC Furries

General Category => General Board => : lyky April 30, 2011, 11:01:05 -06:00

: another baby furs on here
: lyky April 30, 2011, 11:01:05 -06:00
just out of curiosity another baby furs or diaper furs on this site

: Re: another baby furs on here
: mediar April 30, 2011, 11:42:51 -06:00
Not a baby fur, but has nothing against um... just have an overwhelming urge to tickle their chins!
: Re: another baby furs on here
: lyky May 01, 2011, 12:00:45 -06:00
meep *hides chin*
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Renwaldo May 01, 2011, 12:01:20 -06:00
. . .

Ember! Get in here right now! I have found a use for you!
:o

edit:   

V  Haha, and of course the person to do that would be the good Lieutenant! XD
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Zythren May 01, 2011, 04:57:53 -06:00
inb4 "babyfurs are gross and not welcome here."

I know at least one of you will respond with "ew."
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Lt ReiStark May 01, 2011, 06:53:02 -06:00
Quick get the pedobear repellent!
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Van_Fox May 01, 2011, 08:11:50 -06:00
Baby made a boom boom? o.o
: Re: another baby furs on here
: lyky May 01, 2011, 08:14:32 -06:00
lol no I didn't
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Acco May 02, 2011, 01:39:39 -06:00
Honestly, not like it matters much anyway, least as long as it stays within the bedroom irl. /shrug
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Vanilla Skunk May 02, 2011, 03:13:56 -06:00
It does take a lot of guts to come forward with something like this.  I would say that it comes down to respect on both sides.

I was also curious as to the babyfur presence here as well, but at the same time, I don't want to see any of the hate that comes out of the woodwork when someone comes foreward.

Which is probably why nobody really has come forward.  I know there are quite a number of babyfurs in this conmunity, but they need to feel welcome to come forward.  Seeing some of the previous responses, so far it doesn't look good.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: zenia May 02, 2011, 07:46:37 -06:00
I've often wondered about babyfurs. Why be a baby? Especially those who do adult RPs.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: lyky May 02, 2011, 08:36:47 -06:00
: zenia  May 02, 2011, 07:46:37 -06:00
I've often wondered about babyfurs. Why be a baby? Especially those who do adult RPs.

shrugs
don't know he to answer lol
and first thing I thought when I saw your name was Xenia worrier prinsess lol no offence
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Vanilla Skunk May 02, 2011, 08:56:35 -06:00
Why be a baby?

Well, let me respond with another question.

Why be a furry?

Because you want to.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: zenia May 02, 2011, 09:37:11 -06:00
: Felix McKline  May 02, 2011, 08:56:35 -06:00...
But that does not answer my question! T__T
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Vanilla Skunk May 02, 2011, 09:54:10 -06:00
I don't think I could begin to tell you the full reason why. 

But that's really what it comes down to...  you want to.

You want to for some reason.

It's different for everyone.

For some, it's a psychological thing.  It helps.

For others, they just have weird interests.

I will say I have no idea why people like Scat.

But then again, I have seen dogs eat fecal matter out of baby diapers.  (True babies by the way.)  I guess I shouldn't judge.

: Re: another baby furs on here
: Renwaldo May 03, 2011, 01:13:39 -06:00
: Felix McKline  May 02, 2011, 09:54:10 -06:00

I will say I have no idea why people like Scat.

But then again, I have seen dogs eat fecal matter out of baby diapers.  (True babies by the way.)  I guess I shouldn't judge.



Ugh! Good god Felix, is this really the place to discuss such things?!  :(
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Ember May 03, 2011, 01:26:08 -06:00
: Renwaldo  May 01, 2011, 12:01:20 -06:00

Ember! Get in here right now! I have found a use for you!
:o


*Earperks*
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Vanilla Skunk May 03, 2011, 05:06:36 -06:00
: Renwaldo  May 03, 2011, 01:13:39 -06:00
Ugh! Good god Felix, is this really the place to discuss such things?!  :(

Yes it is.  I used that as an example because I find it very disgusting myself, just like a good number feel about babyfurs.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Van_Fox May 03, 2011, 05:11:11 -06:00
I think it would be more acceptable if baby furs were actually under the age of 20.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Acco May 03, 2011, 05:58:37 -06:00
: Van_Fox  May 03, 2011, 05:11:11 -06:00
I think it would be more acceptable if baby furs were actually under the age of 20.

I think it comes down to this: Inflation's a weird fetish. Furries are okay with that. Vore is a weird fetish. Furries are okay with that. Watersports is a weird fetish. Furries are okay with that. Snuff is a very weird fetish. Furries accept it. Castration is a weird fetish. Furries also accept this.

What's the difference between any of the weirdness/squickiness of these fetishes and diapers? Live and let live man.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Gizmo May 03, 2011, 06:15:02 -06:00
: Van_Fox  May 03, 2011, 05:11:11 -06:00
I think it would be more acceptable if baby furs were actually under the age of 20.
so a 14, 15, 16 year old wearing a diaper is acceptable but a 30, 40, or 50 year old, its not? Hmmmm
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Van_Fox May 03, 2011, 06:15:27 -06:00
So furries accept yiffing babies?
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Gizmo May 03, 2011, 06:17:39 -06:00
: Van_Fox  May 03, 2011, 06:15:27 -06:00
So furries accept yiffing babies?

Yiffing? I'll have to re-read the thread and see where ANYONE actually mentioned ANYTHING about Yiffing!!! If they did, I am outta here!!!
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Van_Fox May 03, 2011, 06:20:56 -06:00
If baby/diaper furs is a fetish (fetish deriving from a sexual nature), then wouldnt that mean some furries find baby furs sexually attractive? Which in my book is just wrong?
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Gizmo May 03, 2011, 06:23:38 -06:00
: Van_Fox  May 03, 2011, 06:20:56 -06:00
If baby/diaper furs is a fetish (fetish deriving from a sexual nature), then wouldnt that mean some furries find baby furs sexually attractive? Which in my book is just wrong?
There's one thing about 'yiffing' an underage child ... its another when there is a perception of an ADULT being a child. Explain again how that is wrong???
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Van_Fox May 03, 2011, 06:28:26 -06:00
Its not that, its the concept.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Gizmo May 03, 2011, 06:31:14 -06:00
: Van_Fox  May 03, 2011, 06:28:26 -06:00
Its not that, its the concept.
The 'concept' of being younger than my chronological age is wrong? We should contact all the skin care companies in the world ... all the make up retailers in the mall ... tell them all that what they sell (the ability to look younger than the customer really is) is WRONG?? Really????
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Acco May 03, 2011, 07:03:10 -06:00
: Van_Fox  May 03, 2011, 06:28:26 -06:00
Its not that, its the concept.

Think you might have the concept even a little bit messed up. It's not necessarily true that babyfur = liking to have sex roleplaying an underage person/roleplaying the older person either. Some have it, sure. Perhaps thats maybe a little bit disagreeable to some. But its certainly not the case for a majority of people into it.

You should consider actually getting to know a couple before lumping everybody from this group into being undesirable from an assumption.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Selkit May 03, 2011, 07:51:10 -06:00
Van, before you jam your foot further into your mouth, assuming a stereotype can generally be applied to an entire group, allow me to explain something here:

Babyfur != pedophile. Much like there are trans-gendered individuals, or individuals with dysmorphia, the Babyfur phenomenon is most commonly, a dysmorphic expression applied to age, rather than some physical characteristic. The vast majority of babyfurs I know are nonsexual, and generally entertaining to be around regardless of what their actual biological age is. Sexuality has little to no involvement in their fandom, and for that matter? A lot of the mainstream furry fandom *doesn't* express their fandom in sexuality. Much like how furry != automatic bestiality practitioner, babyfur != automatic pedophile.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Vanilla Skunk May 03, 2011, 08:11:02 -06:00
Thank you, Selkit.

That was way better than what I had to say.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Lt ReiStark May 03, 2011, 10:14:12 -06:00
OK im fine with if you are doing Transformation or body morphs where an adult becomes a baby but don't have sex with real infants because that is just wrong, there is a reason that such things are illegal.  if you want to have fantasies about it or RP it go ahead, just don't get me involved.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: Zen May 03, 2011, 10:30:45 -06:00
Pedophile - A fetish for, or the interest in, engaging in sexual actions/intercourse with children.

Age Play - A some-times "fetish" for identifying oneself as being a younger age than they are. This includes acting / speaking like a person of that mental development age, while the actor is of an older age, usually an adult. Note, this does not always sexual, in fact, it can be far from it. Some people can identify so well with an age, they can act it. But it's not about sex. Similar to fursuiting, it's not always about sex, but expressing one's self and identity.

Baby furry - A furry who enjoys incorporating age play into their furry identity.


Now that we have that cleared up, can we stop with the "ageplay == pedophile" assumption? Considering we all identify with a fursona (at least one, if not more), what is so hard to understand about identifying with a different age too? Also, if all people are involved are consenting adults, but one is acting younger, where is the harm? It's adults and consensual.
: Re: another baby furs on here
: lyky May 03, 2011, 10:35:45 -06:00
: Zen  May 03, 2011, 10:30:45 -06:00
Pedophile - A fetish for, or the interest in, engaging in sexual actions/intercourse with children.

Age Play - A some-times "fetish" for identifying oneself as being a younger age than they are. This includes acting / speaking like a person of that mental development age, while the actor is of an older age, usually an adult. Note, this does not always sexual, in fact, it can be far from it. Some people can identify so well with an age, they can act it. But it's not about sex. Similar to fursuiting, it's not always about sex, but expressing one's self and identity.

Baby furry - A furry who enjoys incorporating age play into their furry identity.


Now that we have that cleared up, can we stop with the "ageplay == pedophile" assumption? Considering we all identify with a fursona (at least one, if not more), what is so hard to understand about identifying with a different age too? Also, if all people are involved are consenting adults, but one is acting younger, where is the harm? It's adults and consensual.

: Selkit  May 03, 2011, 07:51:10 -06:00
Van, before you jam your foot further into your mouth, assuming a stereotype can generally be applied to an entire group, allow me to explain something here:

Babyfur != pedophile. Much like there are trans-gendered individuals, or individuals with dysmorphia, the Babyfur phenomenon is most commonly, a dysmorphic expression applied to age, rather than some physical characteristic. The vast majority of babyfurs I know are nonsexual, and generally entertaining to be around regardless of what their actual biological age is. Sexuality has little to no involvement in their fandom, and for that matter? A lot of the mainstream furry fandom *doesn't* express their fandom in sexuality. Much like how furry != automatic bestiality practitioner, babyfur != automatic pedophile.

starts clapping
with being a baby fur I don't rp adult situations as a cub if I do adult situations as a adult I may be in a diaper but I am still a adult

ok and now back to my question but modified slightly
I was wondering if there were another baby furs here and if you arnt as comfortable with being as open with it as I am then just pm me I am just trying to find some cubs to hang with here hope to here back from some of you